The trend toward more tech and automation dominates the headlines and the business agenda. The hype can create a “tech bias” for problem solving and performance optimization. But when you’re trying to make decisions about the best course for your business or manufacturing operations, it’s critical thinking and accounting for as many complex interdependencies as possible that will lead you to the right choice: human resources or robotics?
Even with advancements in automation and data/analytics, leaders must remain grounded and do careful analysis of the trade-offs and consequences – intended or otherwise — related to decisions about whether to automate processes.
Here are a few items every manufacturing leader should think about when it comes to making choices and trade-offs with your staff and leveraging robotics.
All the possible consequences – intended and unintended — of a robotics vs. people decision come together in the business case for how to approach a production problem or solution. It’s the business case that has to support the choice – one way or the other. Consider the above items on your current or future projects where you’re deciding whether robotics should replace human resources. And always remember: people have the flexibility and judgment to do what you want or need them to do, whereas machines will only do what you program them to do.
CCO cannot and does not provide legal advice. It’s important to consult with qualified counsel before adopting any new policies. It’s also your responsibility to determine whether legal review of work product is necessary prior to implementation.